Friday, November 13, 2009
New Motto - Tempus Edax Rerum
I'm in my thirties trying to figure out what I want to do with my life. All I have to do is say, "tempus edax rerum" to myself and I realize it doesn't really matter -- as long as it involves devouring of aged bourbon.
I'm taking it with a "this too shall pass" twist....
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Waiting for Godot.
Estragon: Ti-ed.
Vladimir: How do you mean tied?
Estragon: Down.
Vladimir: But to whom? By whom?
Estragon: To your man.
Vladimir: To Godot? Tied to Godot! What an idea! No question of it. (Pause.) For the moment.
Estragon: His name is Godot?
Vladimir: I think so.
Estragon: Fancy that. (He raises what remains of the carrot by the stub of a leaf, twirls it before his eyes.) Funny, the more you eat the worse it gets.
Vladimir: With me it's just the opposite.
Estragon: In other words?
Vladimir: I get used to the muck as I go along.
Estragon: (after prolonged reflection). Is that the opposite?
Vladimir: Question of temperament.
Estragon: Of character.
Vladimir: Nothing you can do about it.
Estragon: No use struggling.
Vladimir: The essential doesn't change.
Estragon: Nothing to be done. (He proffers the remains of the carrot to Vladimir.) Like to finish it?
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
Must be tough being a CA taxpayer....
"...authorities had projected a crowd of 250,000 or more. Besides reporters and those with tickets to the memorial service, the crowd around the Staples Center perimeter numbered only about 1,000...Police had based their projection of 250,000 people on turnouts for the funerals of Princess Diana and Elvis Presley, along with the recent Los Angeles Lakers NBA championship parade...Police helicopters flew overhead, and officers patrolled on foot and bicycle."
I can't say I really think the guy was all that....apparently about 249,000 potential turnouts thought the same thing.
But the big question, how much is all this costing the taxpayers? I'm thinking there are officers looking forward to some nice OT right now.
Monday, June 8, 2009
The SPAM Continues
The spam filter in gmail seems to be doing a pretty good job. We're now over 7000 , with about 5 or so making it through the filter each day. I had to time the screenshot just so, as I post it's already at 7005.
Hilarious....This is a wonderful new world, isn't it?
Edit 7/7: The final count got to almost 9000, before the spam box was emptied. In all truthfulness though, apparently Google deletes everything older than a month once a month. So at its peak there was 2 months of SPAM. And things must be slowing down, I'm only at 4300 right now.
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
The Davrita
Anyhow, to make the Davrita you need a good tequila. And a pint glass with some ice cubes....
Fill the glass about 1/2 - 2/3 with tequila depending on how many ice cubes are taking up precious volume. Next, add some orange stuff, like Contreau. Say about a 1/3 of the amount of tequila:
By now your glass should be close to 3/4 full. Add the juice of one fresh lime:
Finally, if you want to cut it a bit, fill up the rest with orange juice and add just a pinch of salt. Stir gently and give someone else your keys -- you're finished.
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
Google Spam Box
Take their name, address, e-mail address, and home phone number. Go on sites for life insurance quotes, payday loans, auto loans and quotes, moving companies, even in-home blind consultations. Anything you can think of. Copy and paste the person's contact info in, requesting more information. Giggle....they're screwed.
Near as I can tell, that's what happened to me. Either one of y'all out there don't like me (understandable at times), or (and I'm secretly hoping this is the case) some kid just hacked a company mailing list and started pranking everyone on it. A couple months have passed, and it doesn't look like any ID theft or anything. First, why would they alert me like that? Second, I've checked my credit and put an alert on my account. Third, they apparently didn't have my SSN or birthday based on what they entered for life insurance.
The phone calls have pretty much stopped finally, as they were almost all legit businesses trying to follow up a lead. But my SPAM filter on my gmail account has exploded. At least it seems to work. I used to average around 400-500, as any over 30 days automatically were deleted. You can see where I'm at now. I'm waiting to hit 5000, but I though 4444 was a pretty cool number.
Dave
Friday, April 10, 2009
Obsessed
Six weeks ago I got obsessed with chess. Yes, chess. Marlee joined the chess club. I always liked chess as a kid, but never really learned anything about it except for the rules. I knew no strategy, and so I got my butt whooped every single time. 20 years later, I'm enthralled with it and the strategy involved. I'm still getting whooped, but now I understand why and am improving quickly. Chess was the first app I downloaded to my iPhone.
Chess has been bumped down the list this week and replaced by the re-emergence of my climbing obsession. It's just about all I can think about since Sunday (see the Dave & Co post.) I've been online at work (both during breaks and times when I should be more productive) trying to find and devour any sites devoted to tree climbing. I gave in and ordered a book (On Rope - North American Vertical Rope Techniques) that I've been wanting for a year or more. But what I really want more than anything else is a new saddle that I can hang comfortably in for hours at a time from New Tribe. At night I've been practicing new knots and rigging configurations in the basement.
To add to my current obsession, I've started reading The Wild Trees. Well, I started reading it at home Wednesday night, but became so hooked that I now listen to it in the car on the way to work as well. It's non-fiction, but I think even non-climbers would really like the way he puts the stories together. It's awesome and I highly recommend it. I will probably stay up late tonight to finish it.
It's interesting that the book is based on the canopy rainforests of the Pacific Northwest, including the areas around where I grew up. I really want to go home and visit with all my climbing gear. I know there are some huge Douglas firs up behind our property up there. Not giants like in the book, but still quite big. I'm also looking forward to taking the kids camping down in Jedediah State Park this summer. I think I'll have a new appreciation for the redwoods.
I did get a kids' harness for Marlee for Easter. I can't wait for Sunday to come. The weather is supposed to be nice, so we should be able to go out and climb for awhile. Cailin wants in too. I may have to get a second harness. Or even upgrade to one of New Tribe's kid saddles. Last night I was teaching Marlee how to tie the necessary knots. She definitely has the knack.
Well, I need to hit the pause button long enough to earn my paycheck.
Thursday, April 9, 2009
Investing and Passover Jokes
Today is the first day of Jewish Passover. Part 1.
An elderly man in Miami calls his son in New York and says, "I hate to ruin your day, but I have to tell you that your mother and I are divorcing. Forty-five years of misery is enough."
"Pop, what are you talking about?" the son screams.
"We can't stand the sight of each other any longer," the old man says. "We're sick of each other, and I'm sick of talking about this, so you call your sister in Chicago and tell her." And he hangs up.
Frantic, the son calls his sister, who explodes on the phone, "Like heck they're getting divorced," she shouts, "I'll take care of this."
She calls her father immediately and screams at him, "You are not getting divorced! Don't do a single thing until I get there. I'm calling my brother back, and we'll both be there tomorrow. Until then, don't do a thing. Do You Hear Me?" And she hangs up.
The old man hangs up his phone and turns to his wife. "Okay," he says," They're both coming for Passover and paying their own airfares.Friday, March 13, 2009
new ipod shuffle
"Next step: the iMplant: Speakers in the mastoids with subcutaneous controls behind either ear, wireless recharging and wireless connection to iTunes. Modify me, Culture! Modify me!"
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
Rant
I've kind of avoided using evite anymore than I need to, along with twitter, facebook, and other social narcissitic and invasive web applications. (The exception is how I recently broke down and started blogging, so stone me.) But it is sometimes harder to not give in and could potentially be useful if everyone used it properly. Like say for a Keg Party for St. Patrick's Day where a person needs enough people to show up to finish the keg.
Tons of people don't ever respond, so those are easy to classify as "No". Even the "Maybes" I usually ignore, they rarely actually make it. But for the people who say "Yes", an accurate head count is very useful for buying food, etc. However, this never works like it is supposed to. I send the invite to both husbands and wives, girlfriends and boyfriends, etc. Inevitably the one person responds and says "Yes (+2 guests)" or the like. Several days later the second also will respond the same way or ask a question or make a comment in their post, thereby double counting. Other people just can't seem to count. Evite lets you go in and edit the responses, changing people like Mark Melendez from a "Yes" with a comment saying how he can't make it with the baby coming, to a "No" which I'm sure he meant. But this is painfully slow and quickly frustrating. When I try sending to just one party to avoid duplicate responses, what you get is usually no response. You can't win. I can't win. Let's just pour a pint.
There are those that like to e-mail me and say they can or can't come, etc. So they never show up on the list at all. Of course, I can't necessarily blame the people who refuse to use Evite. But I think I'll blame the people who use it incorrectly.
Rant finished.
Friday, February 6, 2009
Alcohol Thoughts
http://proof.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/05/why-and-how-i-drink/
February 5, 2009, 10:00 pm
Why (and How) I Drink
By Paul ClarkeI recently took a business trip to Las Vegas, which in my line of work meant searching for good drinks. But while traveling to party towns like Vegas or New Orleans is part of the package when your job is related to spirits and cocktails, there are plenty of occupational hazards that come with the territory. For me, the biggest drawback may be confronting the ugly side of alcohol.
I love a good drink, but the alcoholic slushies being sold by the yard in the spring break atmosphere of these cities have all the appeal of a day-old Big Mac left to ferment in the sun. Whether it’s the tall, green plastic flasks of sweetened grain alcohol marketed as “Hand Grenades” to tourists on Bourbon Street, or the Big-Gulp-sized piña coladas served in Eiffel Tower-shaped go-cups toted by visitors stumbling along the Strip, these drinks and the people who regularly slurp them don’t make my job any easier.
As I walk among the party crowd – en route to someplace a little quieter and more subdued, where the drinks are served in modest proportions and in actual glasses – I want to approach the occasional Scripture-quoting soul-savers who also frequent these places, and say a little defensively, “I’m not actually with them – I’m just here to watch.” Not that it would be likely to make any difference, of course; my search for a proper Negroni, no matter the size, is for many people on par with the debauchery of Mardi Gras, simply because of the shared element of alcohol.
These flip sides of the drink equation call to mind G.K. Chesterton’s observation (helpfully posted by a reader in the comments section to my first Proof post) that’s become something of a chestnut in imbibing circles: “The dipsomaniac and the abstainer are not only both mistaken, but they both make the same mistake. They both regard wine as a drug and not as a drink.” Early in my drinking life, when I would meet my high school friends beneath a remote river bridge near my Oklahoma hometown to drink warm beer or cheap gin mixed with Sprite, I fell soundly into Chesterton’s dipso category (which for a 17-year-old is pretty much par for the course).
As I matured, however, so did my relationship with alcohol. While it seems obvious in some ways, I eventually realized that different forms of drink have different tastes (and not simply the taste of the things you throw in to mask the alcohol), and that some of these drinks actually had some real appeal. While I still have friends who view the taste of beer, wine or spirits as secondary, at best, to the potency of the drink (whether they view this as a positive or a negative depends on the person), over time I came to value the flavor and character of a drink much more than the inherent buzz.
That’s not to say that I’m either disingenuously oblivious or unappreciative of alcohol’s chemical side. When I sit at a local bar and sip a Last Word or a Toronto Cocktail, I enjoy the slow suffusion of warmth and the language-loosening properties of drink that enable a preternaturally shy person like me to strike up a conversation with a complete stranger. But to end the observation there, myopically viewing alcohol’s effect as the be-all and end-all reason for drinking, or to see an inevitable progression from one or two drinks to nine or ten, misses the point of a good drink as entirely as those who down quarts of frozen margaritas during an epic Vegas bender.
I drink because I like it, and for reasons that usually place “effect” a step or three down the list. I love the spicy sweetness of whiskey and I’m a total sucker for the herbal ballet of a good vermouth; when tasting well-made spirits and cocktails composed from them, I can admire the skill of a talented distiller, along with that of a bartender who understands what they have. While plenty of spirits and cocktails are so artlessly made as to make me consider early retirement, there are great new things being done by bartenders and distillers, making this an exciting time to be a drinker.
Drinking also satiates my historical and culinary curiosity: as a fan of obscure and sometimes obsolete spirits and cocktail ingredients, I’ve spent inordinate amounts of time searching for liqueurs, bitters and other products that appeared in bar manuals from the 1860s through the 1950s, but which disappeared from bars decades ago. Recreating these drinks and having the chance to taste them gives me a richer perspective of other eras and places, an experience I usually find far more satisfying than the simple buzz I could get from something as pedestrian as a vodka and tonic.
But in addition to these reasons why I drink, there’s another factor that comes into play. As paradoxical as it may sound to include it, in a roundabout way I’m also drinking for my kids – but before you leap to the comments section and spit out an accusatory fireball, please hear me out.
During my formative-drinking years, when alcohol was still a relative novelty, I had something that many of my harder-drinking friends did not: parents who demonstrated a responsible relationship with alcohol. My father and sometimes my mother would crack a cold beer on hot days, and wine was regularly served at dinner on weekends and special occasions to everyone including the kids. They kept a decently stocked liquor cabinet, but usually only opened it for drop-by guests and the occasional dinner party, which were celebrated in good cheer but were seldom if ever followed by awkward phone calls the next day.
This open yet modest approach to alcohol was in contrast to the paths taken by the families of some friends and neighbors, whose habits ranged from over-indulgent to abstemious and were sometimes an odd mix of the two: it was not lost on me during my secular Bible Belt upbringing that some of my hardest-drinking friends – whose relationships with booze were often of the vomit-in-the-shrubbery, loss-of-all-personal-control variety – were from religious homes in which alcohol was seldom if ever served.
Knowing that my 6-year-old daughter and 8-year-old son will likely start to experiment with alcohol in – let’s be realistic – about a decade, give or take, I fully realize that every time my wife or I take a drink around them, a message is being sent. There are several directions this can go, and I understand I’ll never have total control over any of them. If completely banishing alcohol from our home would protect them from any of its hazards later in life, it’d be an easy choice, but as my old hard-drinking friends demonstrated, that’s just a bit too simple and naïve to be a realistic option.
Instead, I try to mirror the moderate approach taken by my own parents, leavening this with the lessons I learned from these hard-drinking friends who had more rigid upbringings, along with those I pick up from watching the unique slice of life visible in Las Vegas and New Orleans: when it comes to alcohol, an extreme approach at either end of the spectrum can be bad news. Too much is always too much, and none at all can also be too much; but tacking an even course between the two is usually just enough.